4 ms·
This is interesting, can either the judge or the lawyer for the victims not ask the website and assets to be permanently barred from operation? I think that is
by yalogin 2y ago
This is interesting, can either the judge or the lawyer for the victims not ask the website and assets to be permanently barred from operation? I think that is where the value is for the victims.
Even if some party comes in and purchases it, what is to prevent the assaulter from buying it back, he is already offering 8 million in cash, wihch means any one buying it for less will be able to make an immediate profit. However, if the judge can ban it from operation entirely that will be valuable as at least one less website peddling blatant lies.
- reverendsteveii 2y ago>I think that is where the value is for the victims. A lot of the victims agreed with you, which is why they agreed to forfeit any claims they had if the sale to the onion went through a few months back (which would result in the site either being shut down or being distorted outside its original intent so much that for all intents and purposes the infowars that hurt them would exist no more). The judge decided to void that sale because he knows better than the victims what the victims want and he decided the victims wanted the cash amount of the sale to be as high as possible.