4 ms·
I've not yet managed to successfully write any meaningful contribution to a codebase with an llm, faster than I could have written it myself. Ok sure it writes
by greybox 2y ago
I've not yet managed to successfully write any meaningful contribution to a codebase with an llm, faster than I could have written it myself.
Ok sure it writes test code boiler plate for me.
Honestly the kind of work im doing requires that I understand the code im reading, more than have the ability to quickly churn out more of it.
I think probably an llm is going to greatly speed up Web development, or anything else where the impetus is on adding to a codebase quickly, as for maintaining older code, performing precise upgrades, and fixing bugs, so far ive seen zero benefits. And trust me, I would like my job to be easier! Its not like I've not tried to use these
- AStrangeMorrow 2y agoFor me it has helped with: - boilerplate/quick prototyping - unit tests - quick start with a new language/library that I don’t really know But yes, once the codebase starts to grow ever so slightly the only use I found is a glorified autocomplete. Overall it does save me time in writing code. But not in debugging.