3 ms·
Yeah due to the lack of a blue sky, shadows on the moon are basically completely black and challenging to photograph. Also the Hasselblad camera they sent to t
by porphyra 2y ago
Yeah due to the lack of a blue sky, shadows on the moon are basically completely black and challenging to photograph.
Also the Hasselblad camera they sent to the moon back then was actually pretty good even by modern standards.
- ballooney 2y agoSpectacular still by modern standards.
- FredPret 2y agoIt was a medium format camera; it's going to be good camera at any point. I think it had a 7x7cm film - that's a humongous, 49cm^2 sensor compared to a regular full-frame camera, which clocks in at 8.64cm^2. As far as I can tell, the iPhone's is a tiny 0.25cm^2. Combine with no-holds-barred lenses and you're bound to get fantastic pictures even six decades ago. https://www.hasselblad.com/about/history/500-series/ https://www.hasselblad.com/about/history/500-series/ https://www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/a11/a11-hass.html#:~:text=Finally%2C%20The%20film%20used%20on,black/white%20in%20each%20loading. https://www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/a11/a11-hass.html#:~:text=...
- porphyra 2y agoTo be fair, the optical light gathering ability of a full frame f/1.4 lens is slightly better than that of the Hasselblad 80mm f/2.8, and modern digital sensors have eclipsed 6x6 film in every respect, such as resolution, sensitivity, and indeed even dynamic range. Photo technology has in fact progressed a fair bit in the last half a century. Of course, nothing can touch the light gathering ability of that Zeiss 50mm f/0.7, but then that lens wasn't very sharp anyway and modern digital sensors can go up to way higher ISO than possible with film while still making decent pictures.
- FredPret 2y agoI'd love to see a Phase One take some pics on the moon. - 5cm x 4cm sensor - 150 MP - $60k