3 ms·
> You're defending atrocious behavior by people who are brandishing their scientific credentials to legitimize it. Nonsense. I have done no such thing. Please
by defrost 2y ago
> You're defending atrocious behavior by people who are brandishing their scientific credentials to legitimize it.
Nonsense. I have done no such thing. Please don't lie and misrepresent, that's simply dishonest.
You're overstating the importance of a letter to the editor that expresses an opinion.
So overstating that importance it's both comical and reflects poorly on yourself and your credibility in making any statements about science.
- ETH_start 2y agoYou’re defending these scientists’ choice to cloak radical ideological stances in their scientific authority, and Science’s decision to broadcast those stances, lending them unearned legitimacy. You’re excusing the letter authors by insisting they don’t equate anti-DEI directives with white supremacy. But instead of calling them out for viciously and dishonestly branding those directives as a 'recodification of white supremacist philosophies', you’re criticizing me for objecting to this sham being paraded as science