His argument is that incompleteness means that humans will always be able to do things that non-quantum machines can't. I don't agree with this view. > In my

His argument is that incompleteness means that humans will always be able to do things that non-quantum machines can't. I don't agree with this view. > In my view its inevitable that we'll build an AI that is more capable than a human. Seems pretty likely, with a big uncertainty on timeframe. > And that the AI will be able to build better computers, and write better software. That the singularity. This could happen, but I don't agree it's an inevitable consequence of the first.