3 ms·
Okay you had your FUD, now for the just desserts: This is actually a feature that is likely to reduce the amount of JS that needs to run on the web. It allows f
by namuol 2y ago
Okay you had your FUD, now for the just desserts: This is actually a feature that is likely to reduce the amount of JS that needs to run on the web. It allows for common component-oriented styling patterns to be employed without bloating CSS bundles or using runtime CSS-in-JS functionality to accomplish it. Source: I work on a web development platform (booo, hisss)
- lenkite 2y agoI wish someone would give an example of why we need this. Doesn't @scope handle component-oriented styling ?
- rchaud 2y ago> This is actually a feature that is likely to reduce the amount of JS that needs to run on the web. The bulk of JS executed on websites today seem to be for 2 things: - serving ads and tracking - running a single-page app framework Can something like this really derail the React/Vue train?