3 ms·
Every change really does break someone's workflow https://xkcd.com/1172/ https://xkcd.com/1172/ Counter-argument against exempting the demo page: https://news.
by DrammBA 2y ago
Every change really does break someone's workflow https://xkcd.com/1172/ https://xkcd.com/1172/
Counter-argument against exempting the demo page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43237672 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43237672
- geor9e 2y agoAt a certain point, one must take responsibility for clicking "a scroll bar buddy that walks down the page when you scroll" and then being faced with exactly what it said.
- DrammBA 2y agoI agree that preferring reduced motion and then visiting a site whose sole purpose is presenting motion is an interesting choice, but I don't think the CSS Working Group or web developers in general are in any position to question it.
- Mashimo 2y ago"Dead dove, do not eat" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUKmq7UMJys https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUKmq7UMJys
- crabmusket 2y ago> Counter-argument against exempting the demo page I really don't think that's a counter-argument for exempting the demo. It's an argument against ever implementing this feature on an actual website. Or, an argument for using the prefers-reduced-motion check on an actual website.
- hello12343214 2y agoI like that cartoon. much care and thought should be taken when implementing changes that affect users :)
- DeepSeaTortoise 2y agoI really wish there was a separate category for "short and funny" xkcds. Some of them are incredibly hilarious, but the author is just way too productive.