>That's why replication is the gold standard in science. Will other scientists come to the same results when they perform a published experiment in their own la

>That's why replication is the gold standard in science. Will other scientists come to the same results when they perform a published experiment in their own lab? I feel like it's worth a reminder to those reading this that replication isn't just about preventing fraud. I've personally seen far fewer examples of fraud than I have cases where difficulty reproducing results led to the discovery of considerations affecting the experiment that happened to present in the original experiment, but that the original researchers might not have thought of, or thought significant.