I’m in agreement with you. I was asking the other commenter (what) why he felt free to dismiss your definition on accessibility as a revision, while at the sam

I’m in agreement with you. I was asking the other commenter (what) why he felt free to dismiss your definition on accessibility as a revision, while at the same time asking us to abide by his arbitrarily decided definition as the one true definition. I fully think that accessibility is impossible without freedom to use all possible functionality.