6 ms·
You don't. My point simply is far more people than you may currently expect consider actually using something as a meaningful part of access. It is kind of si
by ddingus 2y ago
You don't.
My point simply is far more people than you may currently expect consider actually using something as a meaningful part of access.
It is kind of silly to separate the two in this context.
However ill advised I may consider it to be, you get to do that.
Access to media without use does not make much sense. "Here, hold this DVD for me."
Thanks?
- dghlsakjg 2y agoI’m in agreement with you. I was asking the other commenter (what) why he felt free to dismiss your definition on accessibility as a revision, while at the same time asking us to abide by his arbitrarily decided definition as the one true definition. I fully think that accessibility is impossible without freedom to use all possible functionality.
- ddingus 2y agoAhh. Indeed, thank you. I noted that, but did not ask as you did.