2 ms·
18F and other such "enablers" are an unnecessary antipattern in the age of AI. They were useful before, but AI is now a more democratic and more deeply embedded
by OutOfHere 2y ago
18F and other such "enablers" are an unnecessary antipattern in the age of AI. They were useful before, but AI is now a more democratic and more deeply embedded enabler. The reason why they're an antipattern is they force their ideas on everyone, resulting in groupthink, also blocking independent innovation.
- thephyber 2y agoEye roll. AI generated code is not that accurate or reliable. Maybe in several years if future LLM releases are less disappointing than ChatGPT 4.5… And it’s corrupt as hell if the US feds are going to be mandated to use an AI owned by the employee who is blindly chainsawing all of the institutional knowledge anywhere near the US government.
- OutOfHere 2y agoGuidelines are one thing, but I am against prescriptive requirements of any kind. They harm innovation significantly. Of course I don't approve of a particular AI being mandated. Currently, yes, AIs don't replace humans for code. AI only empowers the human to discover approaches that could help.