3 ms·
I haven't used 4.5 but have some experience using Claude for creative writing, and in my experience it sometimes has the uncanny ability to get to the core of m
by torginus 2y ago
I haven't used 4.5 but have some experience using Claude for creative writing, and in my experience it sometimes has the uncanny ability to get to the core of my ideas, rephrasing my paragraph long descriptions into just a sentence or two, or both improving and concretizing my vague ideas into something that's insightful and tasteful.
Other times it locks itself into a dull style and ignores what I ask of it and just produces boring generic garbage, and I have to wrangle it hard to get some of the spark back.
I have no idea what's going on inside, but just like with Stable Diffusion, it's fairly easy to make something that has the spark of genius, and is very close to being perfect, but getting the last 10% there, and maintaining the quality seems almost impossible.
It's a very weird feeling, it's hard to put into words what is exactly going on, and probably even harder to make it into a benchmark, but it makes me constantly flip-flop between scared of being how good the AI is, and questioning why I ever bothered with using it in the first place, as I would've progress much faster without it.