3 ms·

I'm sorry, but these are further ignorant takes. You'd rather have nuclear proliferation and US trying to defend itself from any country that can have the capa

I'm sorry, but these are further ignorant takes. You'd rather have nuclear proliferation and US trying to defend itself from any country that can have the capacity to wipe out the US? Or the US, a country that had terrorist attacks like 9/11, being deprived of intelligence, and support from allies that allowed the US to extend their reach and logistics? As for the scientific research, are you talking about the mRNA vaccines developed in Germany, to which the US had a privileged access too? Like how much ignorance will you continue to display in this thread, and to what objective? Please get some help from a LLM or something like that, I won't even ask you to do a Google search. It's like all your opinions on the matter are acquired from podcasts like Joe Rogan who were pushing Trump and Russian propaganda - it's called podcast knowledge.

pfdietz 2y ago
Yes, this position implies substantial nuclear proliferation. Even those much to the left of Trump are calling for this (granted, because of Trump's actions). https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/japan-south-korea-and-poland-need https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/japan-south-korea-and-poland-n... > As for the scientific research, are you talking about the mRNA vaccines developed in Germany, to which the US had a privileged access too? The point of this position is that the US has access to these scientific results regardless of what the US spends on science. Scientific results are positive externalities. The position is one of free riding on the efforts of others, rather than the opposite. > Like how much ignorance will you continue to display in this thread What ignorance is that, specifically? Also, my describing a position is not advocating that position. Have I stated I agree with it?