2 ms·
Reduction of scope is required to decrease cost and waste. Unfortunately, reducing scope and regulation is a legislative problem, not an executive one. Having
by s1artibartfast 2y ago
Reduction of scope is required to decrease cost and waste. Unfortunately, reducing scope and regulation is a legislative problem, not an executive one.
Having an government organization underfunded and understaffed to fulfill its mission leads to more waste, both on the public and private side.
For example, the solution isnt to fire employees, it is to simplify the tax code.
- alephnerd 2y ago> Unfortunately, reducing scope and regulation is a legislative problem, not an executive one. Exactly!
- nerdponx 2y ago> Reduction of scope is required to decrease cost and waste That doesn't follow at all. Plenty of cost and waste arises while carrying out things that are solidly within the scope of a federal government in the eyes of belief system but anarchism and other forms of extreme heterodoxy. To "provide for the common defense" is literally in the Constitution, yet the DoD is a black hole of funding, while soldiers eat powdered eggs on base.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoFair. I agree that scope is not the only source of waste.