> and they mostly see Firefox as a monetisation vector. They could’ve gone the Wikipedia route and heavily asked for donations, but, instead, they’ve chosen to

> and they mostly see Firefox as a monetisation vector. They could’ve gone the Wikipedia route and heavily asked for donations, but, instead, they’ve chosen to sell user data. That’s why I must leave. At least Google was very obviously reliant on advertising. Mozilla had no excuse other than desperation and pure idiotic evil.