5 ms·
You may also consider using the Jujutsu VCS[0] as effectively a nicer and saner git frontend. I’ve written an intro to it a couple weeks back[1] - I’ve been us
by cube2222 2y ago
You may also consider using the Jujutsu VCS[0] as effectively a nicer and saner git frontend.
I’ve written an intro to it a couple weeks back[1] - I’ve been using it since, and so far haven’t had the need to switch back to git at any point.
[0]: https://jj-vcs.github.io/jj/latest/ https://jj-vcs.github.io/jj/latest/
[1]: https://kubamartin.com/posts/introduction-to-the-jujutsu-vcs/ https://kubamartin.com/posts/introduction-to-the-jujutsu-vcs...
- CharlieDigital 2y agoThis one is probably the best intro I've read: https://v5.chriskrycho.com/essays/jj-init/ https://v5.chriskrycho.com/essays/jj-init/ Really, really good examples and walkthroughs with easy to understand, animated console sessions that show real-world-ish use cases including conflict resolution and why JJ's model makes it easier. Really good read and easy to digest because of the animated session replays. My main takeaway is that the missing pieces right now are IDE support for a world filled with detached heads and a foolproof upstream integration pattern on `push` (requires a bit of manual work to designate the target branch).
- bthallplz 2y agoRegarding IDE support, you might be interested in this VS Code extension: https://github.com/keanemind/jjk https://github.com/keanemind/jjk I found it today and like it quite a bit. The Visual JJ extension (https://www.visualjj.com https://www.visualjj.com) is also good, but JjK feels more integrated to me.
- CharlieDigital 2y agoNice; thanks for sharing this.
- stouset 2y agoI am 100% going to link to the original post and these replies next time there’s a jj thread and people express bewilderment about needing anything else because “git is so simple”.