3 ms·

True, but I'd accept less "features" per year considering very often Mozilla features were not bringing me a lot. A more open, stable, secure browser is all I n

• saghm 2y ago
  For sure, I'm guessing that's where most of us would happily choose to cut scope if it were up to us. Like the sibling comment mentions though, sometimes the pressure for more features comes from elsewhere in the web ecosystem, and as much as I don't feel like there's a strong need for the web to add a bunch of new features, I'd also rather have the features if websites are going to go forward with them regardless because the other browsers aren't slowing down. It's a balance, and it just makes the case more to clear to me that even doing the minimum to keep the browser working with whatever the web currently looks like is is more than enough along with stability and security to keep an organization busy without needing any additional projects.