3 ms·
Long term it might be hard to monetise those infrastructure considering their competition: 1) For coding (API) most probably will stick to Claude 3.5 / 3.7 - b
by pzo 2y ago
Long term it might be hard to monetise those infrastructure considering their competition:
1) For coding (API) most probably will stick to Claude 3.5 / 3.7 - big market but still small comparing to all world wide problems
2) For non-coding API IMHO gemini 2.0 flash is the winner - dirty cheap (cheaper than 4o-mini), good enough and even better than gpt-4o, cheap audio and image input.
3) For subscription app ChatGPT is probably still the best but only slightly - they have the best advanced voice audio conversation but Grok will be probably eating their lunch here
- anukin 2y agoSesame model for voice audio imo is better than ChatGPT voice audio conversation. They are going to open source it as well.
- bckr 2y agoSure but is there an app I can talk to / work with? It seems they're a voice synthesis model company, not a chatbot app / tool company.
- OsrsNeedsf2P 2y ago> They are going to open source it as well. Means nothing until they do
- ipaddr 2y agoFor the rest of us using free tiers ChatGPT is hands down the winner allowing limited image generation, unlimited usage of some model and limited usage of 4o. Claude is still stuck at 10 messages per day and gemini is less accurate/useful.
- Layvier 2y agoWe were using gpt-4o for our chat agent, and after some experiments I think we'll move to flash 2.0. Faster, cheaper and a bit more reliable even. I also experimented with the experimental thinking version, and there a single node architecture seemed to work well enough (instead of multiple specialised sub agents nodes). It did better than deepseek actually. Now I'm waiting for the official release before spending more time on it.