4 ms·

Where are you sourcing book metadata? If this site takes off, you'll need a moderation strategy. Goodreads has been plagued by extortionary negative reviews.

Where are you sourcing book metadata? If this site takes off, you'll need a moderation strategy. Goodreads has been plagued by extortionary negative reviews. https://www.npr.org/2023/12/17/1219599404/goodreads-review-bombing-cait-corrain https://www.npr.org/2023/12/17/1219599404/goodreads-review-b...

ForTheKidz 2y ago
I just assume all reviews are lying unless I know the reviewer or have validated their past reviews. I don't know why these sites don't lean into the social angle and weight reviews by social-graph distance. This certainly doesn't mean you have to HIDE the public reviews by unknown people.... just give an incentive to give input at what sort of reviews you want.
- lukev 2y ago
  Yeah, reviews are inherently social. I’m waiting for someone to build a review platform on top of ATProto (bluesky).
- Hrun0 2y ago
  > I don't know why these sites don't lean into the social angle and weight reviews by social-graph distance. Goodreads does that though. Reviews from friends and people you follow are shown first
  - ForTheKidz 2y ago
    Ah, interesting, apologies for the accidental goodreads slander. I moved on to storygraph a while ago and haven't looked back.
- Freak_NL 2y ago
  Doesn't that require the user to curate a friends list of people with comparable tastes? I've never met someone who has my exact (eclectic and multilingual) taste in books. Besides, I wouldn't even know who to 'friend' or 'follow' on a site like this. What's the point? Chances are I'd just end up in some bubble, which defeats the whole point of reading.
  - ForTheKidz 2y ago
    Presumably you'd agree with a review and then follow someone. I can't say I've ever thought of reading as a way to fight against a "bubble", nor am I sure that being in a "bubble" is inherently a bad thing. I don't think my life is any worse for identifying that I'm not into fantasy smut or steven pinker or self-help neuroticism and in fact my life is better without these authors in it.
vasanthk1125 2y ago
We'll definitely implement automatic review bombing protection. I'm thinking something like Steam does.

ForTheKidz 2y ago

I just assume all reviews are lying unless I know the reviewer or have validated their past reviews. I don't know why these sites don't lean into the social angle and weight reviews by social-graph distance. This certainly doesn't mean you have to HIDE the public reviews by unknown people.... just give an incentive to give input at what sort of reviews you want.

lukev 2y ago
Yeah, reviews are inherently social. I’m waiting for someone to build a review platform on top of ATProto (bluesky).
Hrun0 2y ago
> I don't know why these sites don't lean into the social angle and weight reviews by social-graph distance. Goodreads does that though. Reviews from friends and people you follow are shown first
- ForTheKidz 2y ago
  Ah, interesting, apologies for the accidental goodreads slander. I moved on to storygraph a while ago and haven't looked back.
Freak_NL 2y ago
Doesn't that require the user to curate a friends list of people with comparable tastes? I've never met someone who has my exact (eclectic and multilingual) taste in books. Besides, I wouldn't even know who to 'friend' or 'follow' on a site like this. What's the point? Chances are I'd just end up in some bubble, which defeats the whole point of reading.
- ForTheKidz 2y ago
  Presumably you'd agree with a review and then follow someone. I can't say I've ever thought of reading as a way to fight against a "bubble", nor am I sure that being in a "bubble" is inherently a bad thing. I don't think my life is any worse for identifying that I'm not into fantasy smut or steven pinker or self-help neuroticism and in fact my life is better without these authors in it.

vasanthk1125 2y ago

We'll definitely implement automatic review bombing protection. I'm thinking something like Steam does.