4 ms·
It's a fairly clunky idiom and there's no reason to use it if you prefer more explicit code. I can see the attraction for terse solutions, but even the name is
by TheOtherHobbes 2y ago
It's a fairly clunky idiom and there's no reason to use it if you prefer more explicit code.
I can see the attraction for terse solutions, but even the name is questionable. ("Comprehension?" Of what? It's not comprehending anything. It's a filter/processor.)