4 ms·
I moved to Waterfox on Android and, in a couple of small things, it works better for me than Firefox; but being a soft fork it has some of the problems of Libre
by reidrac 2y ago
I moved to Waterfox on Android and, in a couple of small things, it works better for me than Firefox; but being a soft fork it has some of the problems of LibreFox.
As the post is saying: I'm disappointed, but there is no technical reason to drop Firefox for now. Yet I feel like I must do something when the ToS is still hot, although I don't expect any change from Mozilla.
- poisonborz 2y agoI have to say Firefox (and forks) for Android is several levels inferior to chrome (forks). Just slower and consumes way more battery - and does not even have the customizability of alternatives.
- Valodim 2y agoIt supports web extensions.
- okanat 2y agoSo does MS Edge but you get Microsoft ads and tracking.
- sgc 2y agoFF has ublock origin, so already end of story there. But it also does a better job of allowing me to request desktop site and actually get it, and thus around some website bugs.
- poisonborz 2y agoChrome forks like Kiwi also have ublock, extensions or desktop view.