10 ms·
I think for this web server to compete with caddy/nginx (if the goal is getting other people to use it, if built for fun, please ignore) this needs a good reaso
by ratorx 2y ago
I think for this web server to compete with caddy/nginx (if the goal is getting other people to use it, if built for fun, please ignore) this needs a good reason to exist.
Memory-safe is nice compared to Nginx, but pretty moot when comparing to Caddy. OTOH, perhaps this could aim for better/comparable performance to Nginx (and better than Caddy) whilst being memory safe? It’s still quite a niche use case though.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- yoavm 2y agoAccording to the landing page, it already outperforms Caddy.
- dorianniemiec 2y agoI will later update the performance benchmark chart, since the current one features an earlier alpha version of my web server (Project Karpacz 0.3.0).
- ratorx 2y ago> performs similarly to a popular Caddy web server From the main landing page. Possibly the benchmarks are slightly better, but until Nginx is added it’s hard to say how significant that bump is.
- hu3 2y agoSo does nginx. Still Caddy keeps eating a slice of nginx pie.