3 ms·
The thing is that numbers like 49.8% are meaningless because the current system simply does not result in government that is representative of people's interest
by BrenBarn 2y ago
The thing is that numbers like 49.8% are meaningless because the current system simply does not result in government that is representative of people's interests. There are large numbers of people who don't vote because they feel their vote doesn't matter, and they're right.
- Sabinus 2y agoAn amazing reform that could be achieved is changing to ranked choice voting from the current first-past-the-post. It'll reduce the incentive for politicians to be radical to stand out, and reassures voters that they won't 'waste their vote' if they put an alternative candidate first.
- marsovo 2y agoI once thought this was the solution too, then NYC's ranked-choice mayoral race gave it Eric Adams. Now I don't know. Maybe open primaries?
- Sabinus 2y agoI don't think ranked choice voting particularly helps preventing corrupt politicians. It mostly diminishes the incentive to be an extremist.
- AnthonyMouse 2y agoRanked choice was the error. You want one of the cardinal voting systems like STAR.