What you are saying is true, and this is the feedback I hear every time I talk to a small team of developers (generally fewer than 15 developers). At this stag

What you are saying is true, and this is the feedback I hear every time I talk to a small team of developers (generally fewer than 15 developers). At this stage, you don't need "another set of eyes" because it is not that big of a problem to break something, as you are not going to lose massive amounts of money because of the mistake. All these teams need is a sanity check. They also generally (even without the AI code reviewers) do not have a strong code review process. This is why, in the article, I have clearly mentioned that these are learning based on talking to engineers in Series-B and Series-C startups.