> now that an LLM can pass the Turing test What study are you referring to here? The ones I've seen don't particularly resemble anything Turing described. The

> now that an LLM can pass the Turing test What study are you referring to here? The ones I've seen don't particularly resemble anything Turing described. The preprint from UCSD got heavy coverage in the popular press but its headline claim is an elementary statistical mistake, modifying the test so it's no longer a binary comparison but still treating 50% as a meaningful pass threshold. It hasn't yet passed peer review nine months later, and I'm cautiously optimistic that it never will. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40386571 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40386571