2 ms·
> I get the sense that you’re frustrated that something you’ve invested a lot of time and energy into learning is being automated. Maybe you’re scared because t
by throw10920 2y ago
> I get the sense that you’re frustrated that something you’ve invested a lot of time and energy into learning is being automated. Maybe you’re scared because the technology has moved so quickly and your understanding of how to use it hasn’t kept up.
This is profiling/projection. You're incapable of responding to the GP's points so you're instead emotionally lashing out and attacking them. This is not really suitable for HN.
> But making someone’s day worse on Hacker News isn’t a good way to deal with that.
This suggests that you're incapable of distinguishing criticism of someone's work with personal attacks on them (furthered by the profiling that you tried to conduct above). Those things are not the same. If your day is ruined by someone posting reasonable criticism of an article that you personally submitted to HN, a place explicitly designed for intellectual curiosity, your expectations need to be adjusted.
- rafram 2y agoI did respond to GP’s points. And I didn’t say “day is ruined.” I’m also not OP.
- throw10920 2y ago> I did respond to GP’s points. And you also profiled and personally attacked them. > I didn’t say “day is ruined.” > making someone’s day worse on Hacker News Now you're continuing to be dishonest. For the purposes of this discussion, those are the same thing. > I’m also not OP. Reading my comment will show that I never said you were nor are any of the points I made predicated on that.