3 ms·

This is total bullshit. It's clear by spending 2 minutes with the output, located on https://github.com/ghuntley/claude-code-source-code-deobfuscation https://g

This is total bullshit. It's clear by spending 2 minutes with the output, located on https://github.com/ghuntley/claude-code-source-code-deobfuscation https://github.com/ghuntley/claude-code-source-code-deobfusc.... The AI has just made educated guesses about the functionality, wrote some sensible-looking code and hallucinated a whole lot. The provided code on GitHub does not compile, does not work in the slightest, does not include any of the prompts from the original source, does not contain any API URLs and endpoints from the original, and uses Claude 3 Opus! And this is just from a cursory 5-minute look.

jasonjmcghee 2y ago
This needs to be the top comment. Many folks are arriving on the post and taking it at face value. I don't know if it's ignorance or an attempt at a publicity stunt on the author's part, but it isn't at all what they claim.
- thegeomaster 2y ago
  > I don't know if it's ignorance or an attempt at a publicity stunt on the author's part, but it isn't at all what they claim. I let the author know on Twitter too: https://x.com/thegeomaster/status/1895869781229912233 https://x.com/thegeomaster/status/1895869781229912233 If it's the former, I assume he will update or take down the blog post.
  - jasonjmcghee 2y ago
    > but if it’s not a 1:1 then deobfuscate is the wrong word for sure "if it's not" is so troubling
- Sharlin 2y ago
  Based on the author's other blog posts, they certainly seem to have drunk the LLM Kool-Aid. Likely enough of it to make their conclusions perhaps slightly biased.