4 ms·
“Bozo” is pretty lightweight for someone actively trying to destroy the foundations of this country’s government and democratic policies.
by a12k 2y ago
“Bozo” is pretty lightweight for someone actively trying to destroy the foundations of this country’s government and democratic policies.
- FreebasingLLMs 2y ago[flagged]
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> administrative state (created during FDR) is going away Created by FDR through acts of the Congress. DOGE is ironically recapitulating the lawlessness that tanked Sourh Africa’s economy. Also, we’re seeing a breathless expansion of federal executive power. The administrative state isn’t going away. It’s being subsumed. The size of the government is being increased, not decreased—that’s why the GOP budget calls for $2 trillion in new deficits over ten years. One can celebrate cost cutting. But other than USAID, there is no sign anything durable is being done. The power of the central government is being expanded in ways that should be obviously problematic for anyone thinking ahead: next cycle, a Dem President can just cancel student debts by firing everyone in loan collections and shredding the loan documents.
- a12k 2y ago> Calm down...You're behaving in a histrionic way. This sort of condescension is characteristic of people who hold the opinions you do. The rest of your post is complete nonsense.
- FreebasingLLMs 2y ago[flagged]
- Jtsummers 2y agoYou're responding to someone who believes DOGE is getting rid of corruption in government while Musk is capturing contracts for his own companies. There's no point in responding to people like them. They aren't based in reality. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43036122 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43036122
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y agoHard disagree with this take. There is certainly a purpose responding to them. Whether or not their opinion is changed comes down to them.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Jtsummers 2y agoIf the individual is living in a fantasy land, then any responses here will be discarded by them as fantasy themselves. Someone who legitimately believes that Musk is fighting corruption when Musk is also directing contracts to his own businesses is in a fantasy land. If the individual is trolling, which could be the case here, then responding is just feeding the troll. It encourages them. The better thing in both cases is to ignore them. At most, respond to the comment, but not the individual, with facts (like that Musk is directing contracts to his own companies) so that others don't fall into the same fantasy land.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y agoIt does not seem like we disagree. > At most, respond to the comment, but not the individual, with facts There is still a purpose for the response. It may not be for a particular reader, but there are other readers. It would be worth it to flag and move on if there is nothing to engage with but that’s not the case here.
- tomcam 2y agoI feel they are actively shoring up the country’s foundations. For decades, since the Church committee in the 1970s and under Vice President Gore’s Reinventing Government initiative (which IIRC resulted in the removal of 100,000 government employees), disclosure of questionable or hidden programs was a core progressive value.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y ago> disclosure of questionable or hidden programs We’re seeing more “claims” than “disclosures”. Can you point me any examples of the latter?