3 ms·
not really, unless your word processor outputs significant portions of text for you
by MobiusHorizons 2y ago
not really, unless your word processor outputs significant portions of text for you
- lesuorac 2y agoReally not sure where this tangent is going but looking at hypothetical text it can be pretty obvious that various word processors were used. Like if an email has the same font/etc as google doc then it's pretty obvious they wrote it in a doc and then copy-paste it.
- TeaBrain 2y agoThey were making the point that using a word processor as a tool isn't the same as having an LLM write something, then retain the LLM generated changes such that it is immediately obvious the bulk of the code was generated by an LLM, not that it isn't possible to discern whether someone is using a word processor.
- brookst 2y agoNo, it just does the layout, not the text. Much like LLMs do the code tokens but not the goal. Abstraction in all things, and automation of the lower levels does not devalue the higher levels (that is, a traffic sign works the same regardless if hand painted or commercially printed).