4 ms·
I agree, however the unipolar world ceased to exist a while ago. My take on what we are witnessing is that the US finally acknowledges that what has worked in t
by maratc 2y ago
I agree, however the unipolar world ceased to exist a while ago. My take on what we are witnessing is that the US finally acknowledges that what has worked in the unipolar world won’t work in the one we have.
- IAmGraydon 2y agoWhat does this even mean? The world was working just fine before a nutjob with an axe to grind with the west decided to invade its democratic neighbor.
- maratc 2y ago> What does this even mean? For a short period after the collapse of the USSR, the world used to have only one superpower (which was the US), but it's not the situation anymore. > The world was working just fine I guess you missed the rise of Chinese GDP from 3% to 20% of global GDP, their military buildup, and their advances on the neighbors and the sea.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- calebio 2y agoThe world was not "working just fine". It _appeared_ to be "working just fine" but it isn't. Take a look at U.S. shipbuilding capacity, U.S. military equipment maintenance, and the defense industrial base that is maintaining the _appearance_ of the powerful status quo. This isn't unique to the U.S., the same is happening in Russia. Turns out it costs a _lot_ of money to keep this charade up for everyone.