4 ms·
the enrichment required for a bomb vs a reactor is a bit (a lot) different. how will all these countries that are not allowed to have nukes hide their enrichmen
by tekknik 2y ago
the enrichment required for a bomb vs a reactor is a bit (a lot) different. how will all these countries that are not allowed to have nukes hide their enrichment facilities that cannot be used for reactor fuel? hollow out a mountain like NK?
- sampo 2y agoWhy would they need to hide them? > these countries that are not allowed to have nukes Who says they are not allowed?
- lostlogin 2y agoCountries with them.
- jiggawatts 2y agoLike the US, which was offering military protection in exchange for allies not building nukes. The assurances have now been shown to be worthless.
- lostlogin 2y agoYes, and it’s actually even worse, it wasn’t just ‘not building them’ with Ukraine, they were stripped of them.
- sfifs 2y agoCountries like North Korea and Pakistan managed to build nuclear weapons and credible enough delivery systems a couple of decades ago How difficult do you think it will be for other countries with today's much more modern technology if they really want to build them? Id be very surprised if the likes of Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Israel or even Iran don't already secretly possess nuclear weapons. I'd expext at least several others have ongoing programns - the cautionary lesson from the different fates of Saddam, Gaddafi, Zelensky and Kim has certainly been learned. One way to read Iran's ballistic missile attack on empty Israeli desert is as a demonstration that Israel's defence is unable to stop anything even approaching 100% of ballistic missiles. With nuclear weapons, the cost of even 1 leaker is unacceptable. You notice Netanyahu's public feud with Iran appears to be winding down.
- throw16180339 2y agoIsrael has had nuclear weapons for decades.