I get that people are hung up on the "licensing" clause, but for me it is not the most egregious part. They say elsewhere, > Mozilla can suspend or end anyone’

I get that people are hung up on the "licensing" clause, but for me it is not the most egregious part. They say elsewhere, > Mozilla can suspend or end anyone’s access to Firefox at any time for any reason, including if Mozilla decides not to offer Firefox anymore. This is a direct contradiction of Freedom 0, and is at best a meaningless clause (very bad in a ToS) and at worst a reframing of Firefox to be non-free, either by casting it as a service or something else.