3 ms·
From Wikipedia. Just as a cliched reminder: > In 1994, Ukraine agreed to transfer these weapons to Russia for dismantlement and became a party to the Treaty on
by crossroadsguy 2y ago
From Wikipedia. Just as a cliched reminder:
> In 1994, Ukraine agreed to transfer these weapons to Russia for dismantlement and became a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, in exchange for economic compensation and security assurances from Russia, the United States, United Kingdom and France to respect the Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. Years later, Russia, one of the parties to the agreement, invaded Ukraine.
I live in the upper part of India and I suspect I could have been taking forced Chinese lessons right now if a woman, decades ago, who was called a bitch by a US secretary of state, didn't decide to say 'fuck it!' and went ahead with her plans to have our own modest nukes.
Would this world have been better off if no one had nukes? Of course, yes. I do believe so.
Would we (the world; not just India) have been better off with just USA, Russia, France, UK, China having nukes? Fuck no!!!
And I have a foreboding feeling the list is not going to stop with Pakistan, NK, and that undeclared member of this club. Also, I just hope South Africa has no reasons in the future to regret.
And then: I mean - does anyone else not find the very fucking idea of NPT ridiculous? You can't have nukes, we have and we will keep having it? Why? Just because. Come, sign this now. Assurances? Yeah, maybe. What the actual fuck!
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]