3 ms·
> My experience has certainly been that AWS is both a) more stable, and b) has more migration resources and guides than the reverse. I'm not sure how well foun
by motorest 2y ago
> My experience has certainly been that AWS is both a) more stable, and b) has more migration resources and guides than the reverse.
I'm not sure how well founded the stability argument is. I still remember the infamous series of AWS outages that took place a couple of years ago.
The fact that AWS invests heavily in vendor lock-in is a problem created by AWS, not their competitors.
- noodletheworld 2y ago… I was scrolling back through the “400 reasons not to use azure” in the OP and off the top of my head I’ve seen a dozen of them personally. You decide if that’s more or less stable than AWS. I’d say the evidence is pretty empirical, but hey, all I can say is my experience was utterly unambiguous. You can argue a lot of things, but hundreds of azure fails in a big giant list is probably one of the tougher ones to go “no, this is fine compared to AWS!” about, imo.