> I think the goal posts keep moving, and that if you showed a person from 2019 the current GPT (even GPT-4o), most people would conclude that it's AGI Yes, if

> I think the goal posts keep moving, and that if you showed a person from 2019 the current GPT (even GPT-4o), most people would conclude that it's AGI Yes, if you just showed them a demo its super impressive and looks like an AGI. If you let a lawyer, doctor or even a programmer actually work deeply with it for a couple of months I don't think they would call it AGI, whatever your definition of AGI is. It's a super helpful tool with remarkable capabilities but non factuality, no memory, little reasoning and occasional hallucinations make it unreliable and therefore non AGI imo.