4 ms·
What's the privacy benefit, given that Firefox Sync is E2E encrypted? https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/sync https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/sync
by zymhan 2y ago
What's the privacy benefit, given that Firefox Sync is E2E encrypted?
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/sync https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/sync
- drdaeman 2y agoTo best of my awareness, the login page (including JS code) is still served over the Internet, and encryption keys are derived solely from the password. That’s not a good design for something as sensitive as one’s full browser data.
- 1oooqooq 2y agosend a pr. but don't know how adding a key owned by moz would make this more trustworthy
- AshamedCaptain 2y agoIt used to be that you could have separate login and encryption passwords. It used to be that you could self-host it as easily as pointing to a separate WebDAV server (trivial to spin up if you have _any_ web server at all). Not anymore.
- eadmund 2y agoAs AshamedCaptain notes, Mozilla actively don’t want an actually-secure password storage protocol. They chose to weaken their security.
- vedmed 2y ago[flagged]