3 ms·
Have you tried asking it to be more blunt or even aggressive? It seemed to work quite well. It flat out rejected a pitch for Pied Piper while being cautiously o
by sillysaurusx 2y ago
Have you tried asking it to be more blunt or even aggressive? It seemed to work quite well. It flat out rejected a pitch for Pied Piper while being cautiously optimistic about Dropbox: https://chatgpt.com/share/67c26ff4-972c-800b-a3ee-e9787423b7da https://chatgpt.com/share/67c26ff4-972c-800b-a3ee-e9787423b7...
- edoceo 2y agoYes, using those words. Tried even instructing that default is No. Most repeatable results I got was to evaluate metrics and when too many were not found reject. My feelings are it's in realm of the hallucinating that's routing the reasons towards - yea, this company could work if the stars align. It's like its stuck with the optimism of the first time investor.
- istjohn 2y agoMaybe simultaneously give it one or more other pitches that you consider just on the line of passing and then have it rank the pitches. If the evaluated pitch is ranked above the others, it passes. Then in a clean context tell the LLM that this pitch failed and ask for actionable advice to improve it.