3 ms·
Placebo could be reversion to the mean. If you're cherry picking people who are elevated in X it should not be surprising to see X mean revert during the study
by energy123 2y ago
Placebo could be reversion to the mean. If you're cherry picking people who are elevated in X it should not be surprising to see X mean revert during the study period.
For example, cherry pick people who have the flu. Some people in the placebo group curing their flu in the study period shouldn't be surprising. That happens by default.
- bmacho 2y ago> Placebo could be reversion to the mean. If they are comparing the effect of placebo with no treatment at all, then no, the measured effect of placebo actually can't be that. The reversion to the mean effect would appear for the no treatment at all people too.
- tsimionescu 2y agoThere are no studies like that, though. It's very very hard to study how a group of people suffering from a disease evolves without treatment, both from an ethical perspective (you can't ethically force people not to seek treatment) and from a practical perspective (it's hard to find a significant cohort of people who recognize they have a disease like depression, do not want to seek treatment for it, but are willing to participate in a clinical study). This is especially true for depression, which manifests most of all as a lack of motivation to do anything in those who suffer from it (often with anxiety at the thought of doing new things). So no one really knows, in a scientific, quantifiable sense, how people who suffer from depression evolve without treatment.
- energy123 2y agoIn that case it's unblinded and placebo could be the patient giving the interviewer what they think they want to hear.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]