4 ms·
Would like to know how this compares to https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract
by zitterbewegung 2y ago
Would like to know how this compares to https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract
- rahimnathwani 2y agoTesseract is multilingual. Tesseract extracts all text from doc, without trying to fix reading order. Tesseract runs in many more places, as it doesn't require a GPU. Tesseract's pure text output tends to have a lot of extra bits, e.g. bits of text that appear in diagrams. Good as a starting point and fine for most downstream tasks.
- jesuslop 2y agoand mathpix
- rahimnathwani 2y agoWow. The Mathpix mobile app has support for reading two column PDFs as a single column. You can't run it locally, though, right?
- kergonath 2y ago> The Mathpix mobile app has support for reading two column PDFs as a single column. Mathpix is what gave the best results when I tried a whole bunch of OCR solutions on technical PDFs (multi-column with diagrams, figures and equations). It is brilliant. > You can't run it locally, though, right? Unfortunately, no. Which is a shame because I also have confidential documents to OCR and there is no way I put them on someone else’s cloud.
- rahimnathwani 2y agoDid you try marker? https://github.com/VikParuchuri/marker https://github.com/VikParuchuri/marker I haven't tried olmocr yet and I now realize my 8GB GPU probably won't cut it, as it used a 7B param VLM model under the hood.
- kergonath 2y ago> Did you try marker? I did not, but I will. Thanks for the pointer!
- maleldil 2y agoI haven't checked OlmOCR, but in my experience, Tesseract is awful for scientific papers. The structure is mangled, formulas are completely rubbish, tables are nearly useless, etc. I also tried Docling (which I believe is LLM-based), which works fine, but the references section of the paper was too noisy, and Gemini 2.0 Flash was okay but too slow for a large number of PDFs[1]. I settled for downloading the LaTeX code from arXiv and using pandoc to parse that. I also needed to process citations, which was easy using pandoc's support for BibTeX to CSL JSON. [1] Because of the number of output tokens, I had to split the PDF into pages and individually convert each one. Sometimes, the API would take too long to respond, making the overall system quite slow.