3 ms·
I don't mean to rain on your parade, but humor me for a second. Let's say that Putin is not the only person in Russian leadership who supports war with Ukraine
by bilbo0s 2y ago
I don't mean to rain on your parade, but humor me for a second.
Let's say that Putin is not the only person in Russian leadership who supports war with Ukraine. What then? I mean we get rid of Putin, and the next guy is worse.
I know. I know. That would never happen in a million years. But humor me. What then? Do we have a plan for "we took out Putin and it didn't change anything"?
Or is this whole thing just a fly by the seat of the pants kind of thing?
- ben_w 2y ago> I don't mean to rain on your parade, but humor me for a second. Feel free, this is no parade for me. And if anyone is taking me seriously*, they need serious alternatives to my beliefs. * which would be their first mistake, as I'm a software engineer not a geopolitical military analyst > I mean we get rid of Putin, and the next guy is worse What would "worse" look like? Putin is already at war, has a massive propaganda network and fake elections, yet still feels unable to have another round of mobilisation due to the internal political fallout. Putin is already threatening nuclear weapons, has already updated doctrine — "The doctrine now says an attack from a non-nuclear state, if backed by a nuclear power, will be treated as a joint assault on Russia." - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4v0rey0jzo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4v0rey0jzo The only way to be worse, is to actually use them.
- bilbo0s 2y agoThe only way to be worse, is to actually use them. Then you're starting to see my point.
- ben_w 2y agoWould you rather surrender salami style, or the whole bratwurst? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg-UqIIvang https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg-UqIIvang Putin is already a threat, without actually using the weapons.