5 ms·
Sensationalist title, as usual. I don't see any evidence showing poor reviews. The only people who got it are people at IO anyway, so that's kind of a small sam
by jxi 14y ago
Sensationalist title, as usual. I don't see any evidence showing poor reviews. The only people who got it are people at IO anyway, so that's kind of a small sample. I'd say they delayed it so they could add more features before a real launch, just so it lives up to Google's standards.
- drgath 14y ago> just so it lives up to Google's standards. To be honest, Google doesn't have a great track record when it comes to initial product releases. They get by with it because they release early, iterate often, and eventually develop a winner (a good strategy). But rarely are they winners out of the gate. If your comment were about Apple, then absolutely you'd have a point about high standards.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- ceejayoz 14y ago> I don't see any evidence showing poor reviews. One is linked to in the article itself. Others are hardly difficult to find. > The only people who got it are people at IO anyway, so that's kind of a small sample. I'd say folks at IO are likely to be fairly positive towards Google. > I'd say they delayed it so they could add more features before a real launch, just so it lives up to Google's standards. It wasn't up to Google's standards, but you're doubtful that it got poor reviews?