5 ms·
It does though. I get where you're coming from but thats a naive interpretation of a partial set of facts. Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Ctr does establish that
by halJordan 2y ago
It does though. I get where you're coming from but thats a naive interpretation of a partial set of facts.
Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Ctr does establish that free speech protection can be used against other private citizens
- rascul 2y agoThat court found that the California Constitution protected the free speech in that case. Not the US Constitution, which wouldn't protect the free speech in that case