Whenever a PR department of an authoritative side is speaking of "confusion", I call it BS. The onus is on them to use clear phrases. A dialogue would be alrig

Whenever a PR department of an authoritative side is speaking of "confusion", I call it BS. The onus is on them to use clear phrases. A dialogue would be alright (We meant... You interpret... Let's rephrase...). But single-handedly blaming the other side? Considering that amount of backslash? That's nothing but lame.