3 ms·
It’s not blatantly or obviously corrupt. It is very likely to be better for taxpayers.
by blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
It’s not blatantly or obviously corrupt. It is very likely to be better for taxpayers.
- Volundr 2y agoI can't think of anything much more corrupt than someone in government directing a government contract to a vendor they own with no process for considering other vendors. If that seems fine to you, then I don't think we'll ever agree on what corruption looks like. If Starlink is actually "very likely to be better for taxpayers" it should have no problem going through the normal bidding process competing with other vendors.
- buttercraft 2y agoGood God, it's a textbook example of corruption!