I think you're misapplying "irony". The comment you're responding to doesn't argue for some kind of wishy-washy moral equivalence: they're explicitly advocating

I think you're misapplying "irony". The comment you're responding to doesn't argue for some kind of wishy-washy moral equivalence: they're explicitly advocating for the superiority of their preferred values. Nothing you've offered is an effective rebuttal to their assertion that having 50% "good people" is preferable to 0% "good people" (in the interest of unity).