The article cites a Gallup poll without linking it. Straight from the galluping horse's mouth: https://news.gallup.com/poll/656708/lgbtq-identification-rises.as

The article cites a Gallup poll without linking it. Straight from the galluping horse's mouth: https://news.gallup.com/poll/656708/lgbtq-identification-rises.aspx https://news.gallup.com/poll/656708/lgbtq-identification-ris... "The recent increase is largely due to more adults in their late teens, 20s and 30s -- particularly young women -- saying they are bisexual." The only place the The Hill article mentions bisexuals is in the macro expansion of LGBTQ. If it has a correct explanation, then surely only by accident, not as the result of careful analysis.