4 ms·
One good reason is that it's not always obvious who has the rights. Even if the copyright holder is clear it can be hazy whether there might be outstanding NDAs
by dcminter 2y ago
One good reason is that it's not always obvious who has the rights. Even if the copyright holder is clear it can be hazy whether there might be outstanding NDAs and licensing deals that would cause problems.
So it's usually safer and (importantly) cheaper not to bother. You need either an insider keen on their own initiative to open it up, or a powerful PR reason to do so.
It's a shame, but probably unavoidable. I think we ought as a society to at least dramatically shorten the copyright period for software (it's obvious that something like the patent system's 20 years would be more than sufficient) but I can't see much chance of it changing.
> Will these sources die somewhere and never be revealed? :-)
Sadly, yes, mostly. :'(
- rbanffy 2y agoWould be interesting to have some place to dump the source with a date for disclose it set in the future far away to ensure the work is in public domain by then.