2 ms·
I haven't read the article. All I know is, Firefox changed their TOS. > That clearly indicates some "other" future motive It's training data, isn't it? (It's
by flir 2y ago
I haven't read the article. All I know is, Firefox changed their TOS.
> That clearly indicates some "other" future motive
It's training data, isn't it?
(It's always training data).
- stateoff 2y agoI was referring to Mozilla's past investment into advertising: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-anonym-raising-the-bar-for-privacy-preserving-digital-advertising/ https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-anonym-raising-t... To me that and the new ToS add up, why else would they remove the FAQ entry.
- flir 2y agoTotally fair, tbh. Stealing data for that purpose has already been normalized, so it's a much easier sell.