5 ms·

Based on this, Firefox has a 2.54% market share of browsers worldwide, so if their goal here is to shoot themselves in the foot and get that number under 2%, mi

Based on this, Firefox has a 2.54% market share of browsers worldwide, so if their goal here is to shoot themselves in the foot and get that number under 2%, mission accomplished. Firefox is still the lesser of two evils when compared to Chrome with all of its telemetry turned on. And at least it supports a proper implementation of uBlock origin, which Google just broke in Chrome. https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share previous discussion from mid 2023 on low firefox market share: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36759162 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36759162

m2f2 2y ago
I'm one of them 2.54% and I cringe when some kiddie develops websites around some chrome bugs, just to let us and Apple folks down.
- ta1243 2y ago
  I'm also the 2.54% and have been since the phoenix days. I am beyond thankful every day for apple keeping both desktop safari and ios running to prevent the internet being even more monoculture than in the IE6 days
  - weikju 2y ago
    > I am beyond thankful every day for apple keeping both desktop safari and ios running to prevent the internet being even more monoculture than in the IE6 days Don't worry, EU regulators (and other countries soon I suppose) are doing their best to fix that "bug".
    - Apocryphon 2y ago
      Users sticking with Safari because it is the browser by default on iOS and macOS and they don’t know any better isn’t some sort of moral victory for privacy. (I notice that Apple has only recently been putting out TV ads praising their browser.) It’s almost like privacy through obscurity. And it’s like thanking Samsung for accidentally pushing against Chrome dominance on Android by forcing users to use Samsung Internet by default. Or thanking Microsoft for bundling Edge with Windows. Users generally don’t know about Chrome’s privacy issues or what browser engines are. Apple simply hasn’t done enough to promote Safari and keep it a strong competitor against Chrome. Relying on their monopoly over their platform is them accidentally doing something good in the wrong way. You know why Chrome attracted so many customers when it first launched in 2008 or so? Because IE, and yes Firefox, were incredibly bloated and slow. Apple hasn’t presented a similar performance jump or another compelling reason for Safari over Chrome. And in open-source land, so many hotshot alt-browsers from Arc to Brave all use Blink. Orion uses WebKit, and it’s the only one. Apple clearly doesn’t care to promote it as a Blink alternative other than for their monopolistic mandate of WebKit on iOS. Not to mention, they killed Safari for Windows. Apple apparently doesn’t care about privacy as much as HN thinks they do, see mini-thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39975620 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39975620 Finally, the EU change should in theory be liberating for Mozilla, who can now provide a proper mobile Firefox for iOS that uses Gecko. Instead, from what I hear that isn’t even on the roadmap, because this is the state of modern Mozilla. Here’s hoping that Zen will instead bring Gecko to iOS.
      - ta1243 2y ago
        It's not a moral victory, it is a pragmatic one. If it was 98% chrome and 2% firefox that's basically 100% chrome. Instead safari on ios (and to a lesser extent desktop) means the web isn't 100% chrome (or chrome skins like brave)
        Apocryphon 2y ago
        I’m arguing that Apple should strengthen Safari (and not just on iOS and macOS but to other operating systems owned by them) to make it more compelling to use for customers, and not rely on App Store guideline lock-in on iOS. But they clearly don’t care to, even when they could afford to. And they don’t care about promoting WebKit at all, because any alt-browsers running it would just provide competition for Safari anyway. As it stands it all seems very half-hearted and kind of lazy. “The last temptation is the greatest treason: To do the right deed for the wrong reason.” - T.S Eliot, Murder in the Cathedral
        olyjohn 2y ago
        Having a good web browser doesn't sell apps. That's why they don't care about it. They would rather you not have one at all and only have access to things via apps.
        Apocryphon 2y ago
        Precisely, and it's quite ironic given Steve Jobs' original envisioning iOS as chiefly relying on web apps. The App Store mandate of banning non-WebKit browsers is entirely technical in nature and self-serving; to prevent apps from including third-party JIT compilers[0], and maybe (like Flash was) other browser engines are viewed as unoptimized and insecure for the platform. It's doubtful that Apple actually cares about preventing Chrome's takeover of the web. This is not the guardian you are looking for. [0] iOS Application Security: The Definitive Guide for Hackers and Developers by David Thiel, pg. 8-9 "Jailed Just-in-Time Compilation on iOS" by Saagar Jha https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22401146 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22401146
lost_womble 2y ago
This is such a bad way to look at Firefox browser share. Instead, look at desktop share worldwide, where it's more like 7%.
- yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
  Why is it a bad way to look at it? If anything, I'd argue Firefox is more compelling on Android than desktop.
- account42 2y ago
  This is quibbling over details - both numbers are already low enough that many developers won't even bother to test on FF not to mention fix non-trivial issues, and for both stats the trend is clearly downwards.
ayewo 2y ago
To put some numbers on what a 2.54% market share means, Firefox actually tracks this data. See here: https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity: > Monthly Active Users (MAU) measures the number of Firefox Desktop clients active in the past 28 days. > February 10, 2025: 163,203,913 clients > February 17, 2025: 163,742,671 clients

m2f2 2y ago

I'm one of them 2.54% and I cringe when some kiddie develops websites around some chrome bugs, just to let us and Apple folks down.

ta1243 2y ago
I'm also the 2.54% and have been since the phoenix days. I am beyond thankful every day for apple keeping both desktop safari and ios running to prevent the internet being even more monoculture than in the IE6 days
- weikju 2y ago
  > I am beyond thankful every day for apple keeping both desktop safari and ios running to prevent the internet being even more monoculture than in the IE6 days Don't worry, EU regulators (and other countries soon I suppose) are doing their best to fix that "bug".
  - Apocryphon 2y ago
    Users sticking with Safari because it is the browser by default on iOS and macOS and they don’t know any better isn’t some sort of moral victory for privacy. (I notice that Apple has only recently been putting out TV ads praising their browser.) It’s almost like privacy through obscurity. And it’s like thanking Samsung for accidentally pushing against Chrome dominance on Android by forcing users to use Samsung Internet by default. Or thanking Microsoft for bundling Edge with Windows. Users generally don’t know about Chrome’s privacy issues or what browser engines are. Apple simply hasn’t done enough to promote Safari and keep it a strong competitor against Chrome. Relying on their monopoly over their platform is them accidentally doing something good in the wrong way. You know why Chrome attracted so many customers when it first launched in 2008 or so? Because IE, and yes Firefox, were incredibly bloated and slow. Apple hasn’t presented a similar performance jump or another compelling reason for Safari over Chrome. And in open-source land, so many hotshot alt-browsers from Arc to Brave all use Blink. Orion uses WebKit, and it’s the only one. Apple clearly doesn’t care to promote it as a Blink alternative other than for their monopolistic mandate of WebKit on iOS. Not to mention, they killed Safari for Windows. Apple apparently doesn’t care about privacy as much as HN thinks they do, see mini-thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39975620 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39975620 Finally, the EU change should in theory be liberating for Mozilla, who can now provide a proper mobile Firefox for iOS that uses Gecko. Instead, from what I hear that isn’t even on the roadmap, because this is the state of modern Mozilla. Here’s hoping that Zen will instead bring Gecko to iOS.
    - ta1243 2y ago
      It's not a moral victory, it is a pragmatic one. If it was 98% chrome and 2% firefox that's basically 100% chrome. Instead safari on ios (and to a lesser extent desktop) means the web isn't 100% chrome (or chrome skins like brave)
      - Apocryphon 2y ago
        I’m arguing that Apple should strengthen Safari (and not just on iOS and macOS but to other operating systems owned by them) to make it more compelling to use for customers, and not rely on App Store guideline lock-in on iOS. But they clearly don’t care to, even when they could afford to. And they don’t care about promoting WebKit at all, because any alt-browsers running it would just provide competition for Safari anyway. As it stands it all seems very half-hearted and kind of lazy. “The last temptation is the greatest treason: To do the right deed for the wrong reason.” - T.S Eliot, Murder in the Cathedral
        olyjohn 2y ago
        Having a good web browser doesn't sell apps. That's why they don't care about it. They would rather you not have one at all and only have access to things via apps.
        Apocryphon 2y ago
        Precisely, and it's quite ironic given Steve Jobs' original envisioning iOS as chiefly relying on web apps. The App Store mandate of banning non-WebKit browsers is entirely technical in nature and self-serving; to prevent apps from including third-party JIT compilers[0], and maybe (like Flash was) other browser engines are viewed as unoptimized and insecure for the platform. It's doubtful that Apple actually cares about preventing Chrome's takeover of the web. This is not the guardian you are looking for. [0] iOS Application Security: The Definitive Guide for Hackers and Developers by David Thiel, pg. 8-9 "Jailed Just-in-Time Compilation on iOS" by Saagar Jha https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22401146 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22401146

lost_womble 2y ago

This is such a bad way to look at Firefox browser share. Instead, look at desktop share worldwide, where it's more like 7%.

yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
Why is it a bad way to look at it? If anything, I'd argue Firefox is more compelling on Android than desktop.
account42 2y ago
This is quibbling over details - both numbers are already low enough that many developers won't even bother to test on FF not to mention fix non-trivial issues, and for both stats the trend is clearly downwards.

ayewo 2y ago

To put some numbers on what a 2.54% market share means, Firefox actually tracks this data. See here: https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity: > Monthly Active Users (MAU) measures the number of Firefox Desktop clients active in the past 28 days. > February 10, 2025: 163,203,913 clients > February 17, 2025: 163,742,671 clients