5 ms·
I would not. I would focus on family and friends, leaving as little mess to work through for them after my passing and making the best out of remaining days. Qu
by jajko 2y ago
I would not. I would focus on family and friends, leaving as little mess to work through for them after my passing and making the best out of remaining days. Quality > quantity for me, always.
- kelnos 2y agoThere are always thresholds, though. Would you accept a 10% decrease in the quality of your life in exchange for an extra year? I probably would. I probably still would if that was a 20% decrease. But I probably wouldn't go for that extra year if I had to accept a 90% decrease in the quality of my life. The threshold is a personal decision. There are no right or wrong answers. We should even indulge someone who would accept that 90% decrease for an extra year. That should be their choice, and even if I wouldn't make it myself, that's neither here nor there.
- rsynnott 2y ago> Would you accept a 10% decrease in the quality of your life in exchange for an extra year? I probably would. I probably still would if that was a 20% decrease. But I probably wouldn't go for that extra year if I had to accept a 90% decrease in the quality of my life. The context is _clinical trials_, tho, so that's not generally what's on offer.